5.1.1.
Purpose
Main nature of the contract
:
Supplies
Additional nature of the contract
:
Services
Main classification
(
cpv
):
38432210
Gas chromatographs
Additional classification
(
cpv
):
38432100
Gas-analysis apparatus,
38545000
Gas-testing kits,
39340000
Gas network equipment,
39341000
Gas pressure equipment,
51210000
Installation services of measuring equipment
Options
:
Description of the options
:
The framework agreement can be extended for (2x2 years) by a written notice to the Supplier no later than 3 months before the termination of the Agreement.
5.1.2.
Place of performance
Country
:
Denmark
Anywhere in the given country
Additional information
:
Danmark – 6040 Egtved, 5250 Bellinge, 7400 Herning og 4600 Køge
5.1.4.
Renewal
Maximum renewals
:
2
Other information about renewals
:
2x2
5.1.5.
Value
Estimated value excluding VAT
:
5 000 000,00
EUR
Maximum value of the framework agreement
:
7 000 000,00
EUR
5.1.6.
General information
Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.
The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)
:
yes
Additional information
:
Energinet has decided to cancel the tender due to changes in the tender materiel. Energinet will publish a new tendering procedure as soon as possible.
5.1.10.
Award criteria
Criterion:
Type:
Price
Name
:
Price
Description
:
Prices must be stated in appendix 3: Schedule of Prices (doc. no. 24/06105-15) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the grand total price for evaluation, cf. the Schedule of Prices. The tenderer must fill out all yellow cells in appendix 3: Schedule of Prices (doc. no. 24/06105-15) in order to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Category of award weight criterion:
Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number
:
30,00
Criterion:
Type:
Quality
Name
:
Technical Solution
Description
:
The tenderer must include a completed appendix 2.5: Solution description (doc. no. 24/06105-14) which demonstrates the level of fulfillment of the specifications requested by the Contracting Authority, including any deviations in the proposed solution. Furthermore, the tenderer must include a detailed description of the tendered solution regarding the main elements and especially the tenderer should document: a) Instrument packages • Drift/accuracy/repeatability evaluation • Certificates of international standards and third parties • Performance evaluation rapports from third party testing laboratories for offered instruments • Description of Calibration b) Programming and configuration • Images showing the programming/configuration software screens with an explanation of the basic functions of each icon/menu • A printable report of the parameterizations/configurations to the instrument • Programming documentation with comments/explanations c) Gas Sampling and Conditioning System • A sample system sketch and lag-time calculation adapted to these measures, showing volumes of all filters, t-branched and tubes d) Data connection and data storage • A description of data connection and data storage The tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc. no. 24/06105-20). The proposed deviations to the technical solution must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Technical clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. In the evaluation of “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with appendix 2: Scope of Work (doc. no. 24/06105-9), including the scope and content of any deviations in relation thereto. Any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: a) Instrument packages • It will be evaluated positively if the THT Gas Chromatograph is tested by an independent testing organization and that the accredited calibration certificate is traceable to international standards. • It will be evaluated positively if the THT Gas Chromatograph can both be automatically calibrated and perform manually selected calibration. b) Programming and configuration • It will be evaluated positively if the configuration of the THT Gas Chromatograph is clear and logically structured e.g., a software interface with grouped settings and clearly labeled menus for easy navigation. c) Gas Sampling and Conditioning System • It will be evaluated positively if the location of the pressure reduction points is close to the sampling point, to minimize gas transport time. • It will be evaluated positively if the offered solution designs the sampling system without T-branches, dead ends, or oversized filters, to minimize gas transport time. d) Data connection • It will be evaluated positively if the data connection and communication of the THT Gas Chromatograph can be adapted to the systems of the Contracting Authority, e.g., the data connection uses standard Modbus over TCP/IP, and the data and alarms are accessible to the Contracting Authority’s network and SCADA-system. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Category of award weight criterion:
Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number
:
45,00
Criterion:
Type:
Quality
Name
:
Cyber Security
Description
:
The tenderer must include a completed Appendix 2.4: Cyber Security Requirements for components (doc. no. 24/06105-13) which documents the tenderer’s fulfillment of the Contracting authority’s Cyber Security requirements, including any deviations in the proposed solution. Any deviations from the Cyber Security Requirements must be specified in Appendix 2.4 and explained in detail. In the evaluation of “Cyber Security”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with Appendix 2.4: Cyber Security Requirements for components (doc. no. 24/06105-13). All deviations will be included in the evaluation, and any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on its clarity, content, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations to access control and logging requirements are of particular significance in the evaluation. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Category of award weight criterion:
Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number
:
5,00
Criterion:
Type:
Quality
Name
:
Emissions
Description
:
As part of the evaluation the tenderer must state the total sample gas usage of the THT Gas Chromatograph and sample system in cc/min. The tenderer must include the calculation of the total sample gas usage. The calculation must be based on a case comprising a single sampling point with a cabinet that has a 15-meter sample line between the THT Gas Chromatograph and the sampling location. The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Emissions” will be based on the stated total sample gas usage as offered by the tenderer. A total sample gas usage of the THT Gas Chromatograph and sample system of 500 cc/min or under will result in a score of 10, whereas a total sample gas usage of 1000 cc/min or over will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.
Category of award weight criterion:
Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number
:
5,00
Criterion:
Type:
Quality
Name
:
Delivery time
Description
:
As part of the evaluation the tenderer must state the maximum guaranteed delivery time from Signing of specific Agreement under Framework Agreement till Acceptance of all documentation (milestone 1 to 6). The delivery time must be stated in appendix 4 Time and Payment Schedule (doc. no. 24/06105-16). It should be noted the guaranteed delivery time stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. General Terms and Conditions (doc. no. 24/06105-6), section 15. The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer. A delivery time of 40 weeks or under will result in a score of 10, whereas a delivery time of 52 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered delivery time above 80 weeks will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Category of award weight criterion:
Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number
:
5,00
Criterion:
Type:
Quality
Name
:
Contract terms
Description
:
Tenderer can include a list of proposed deviations to the attached contract terms. The contract terms are defined as below: • Framework Agreement (doc no. 24/06105-7), • Agreement under the Framework Agreement (doc. no. 24/06105-8), • General Terms & Conditions for Woks (doc. no. 24/06105-6), The tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc. no. 24/06105-20). The proposed deviations to the contract terms must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. With the exception of the above-mentioned clauses and sections in sub-section 3.7.1 in this document, which are not part of the evaluation of 'Contract terms', it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Contract terms' and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Category of award weight criterion:
Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number
:
10,00
5.1.15.
Techniques
Framework agreement
:
Framework agreement, without reopening of competition
Information about the dynamic purchasing system
:
No dynamic purchase system
Electronic auction
:
no
5.1.16.
Further information, mediation and review
Review organisation
:
Klagenævnet for Udbud
Information about review deadlines
:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure
:
Energinet Gastransmission A/S
Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents
:
Energinet Gastransmission A/S
Organisation providing more information on the review procedures
:
Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen
BREAKING